Drug Substance Release Testing Service
Packages
Approach
Platforms
Contact
FAQ
Drug substance (DS) is the direct starting material for drug product manufacturing. ICH Q6B requires DS
specifications to cover physicochemical properties, biological activity, and purity/impurities – but requirements
vary widely across product types (AAV, mRNA, LV/RV, ADC, radiopharmaceuticals, cell therapies). Common IND
deficiencies include missing or incomplete DS release strategies.
Creative Biogene provides a one-stop solution covering eight major product types – from universal release tests
(identity, purity, bioactivity, safety) to product-specific CQAs (empty capsid, capping efficiency, RCL/RCR, DAR,
radiochemical purity) – with IND/BLA-ready data packages.
Select the right package for your project stage
| Project Stage |
Recommended Package |
Key Inclusions |
| Early R&D / Process development |
Rapid Release |
Simplified validated methods for rapid CQA data to guide process optimization and product
development. |
| Pre-IND submission |
Advanced Release |
Full product-specific CQA testing (AAV empty capsid, rcAAV, titer ratio; mRNA capping efficiency,
encapsulation, dsRNA, polyA; LV/RV RCL/RCR, titer, integration; cell therapy viability, phenotyping,
RCL, cytotoxicity; ADC DAR, free toxin, unconjugated antibody; fusion/bispecific mispaired species,
glycosylation; radiopharmaceutical identity, purity; AOC OAR, payload distribution, free oligo) +
IND-ready report format. |
| Commercial / BLA submission |
Core Release |
Core release tests per ICH Q6B (identity, purity/impurities, biological activity, physicochemical,
safety) for commercial batch release and post-marketing stability commitments. |
For Rapid Release: qPCR-based rapid methods (e.g., mycoplasma, sterility screen) are validated in parallel with
compendial methods. Final product release for clinical use requires compendial testing where applicable. For
specific test panels, method parameters, or pricing, please contact our technical team.
How We Solve the Challenge
Based on systematic interpretation of ICH Q6B, FDA CGT guidance, relevant USP general chapters, and product-specific
guidelines, we structure DS release testing as: product type identification → core testing matrix → specific testing
modules → submission-ready data delivery.
1. Compliance Framework
ICH Q6B serves as the specification framework, FDA CGT guidance for gene therapy product release, and USP general
chapters for method standards. Our facility operates in compliance with GMP principles; data management follows
ALCOA+ and 21 CFR Part 11, with full LIMS traceability and independent QA review per batch.
2. Core Release Testing Matrix
Universal release tests applicable to all biologics:
- Identity – Peptide mapping, icIEF, or NGS
- Purity & impurities – Aggregates (SEC-HPLC), fragments (CE-SDS), charge variants
(IEX/cIEF), HCP, HCD, Protein A residuals
- Biological activity – Cell-based, binding, or titer assays
- Physicochemical properties – Concentration, pH, osmolality, particulates
- Safety – Sterility, mycoplasma, endotoxin
All methods are validated per ICH Q6B requirements.
3. Product-Specific Testing Modules
AAV-specific testing
For AAV vectors, covering empty capsid rate by orthogonal methods (AUC/IEX/TEM), rcAAV by
serial passage with qPCR, and genome/infectious titer ratio, following FDA CGT guidance.
mRNA-specific testing
For mRNA vaccines and therapeutics, covering capping efficiency by LC-MS (≥95%),
encapsulation efficiency (Ribogreen/DLS), dsRNA residuals (ELISA/J2 antibody), and polyA
tail distribution.
Cell therapy-specific testing
For CAR-T, TCR-T, and NK cells, covering viability (Trypan blue), multi-color flow
cytometry phenotyping, RCL detection (co-culture with qPCR), and cytotoxicity assays.
ADC-specific testing
For antibody-drug conjugates, covering DAR (HIC-HPLC/LC-MS), free toxin residuals, and
the unconjugated antibody ratio.
Fusion protein / bispecific-specific testing
for Fc fusion proteins and bispecific antibodies, covering mispaired species (LC-MS),
glycosylation profiling (LC-MS), and aggregation tendency.
AOC-specific testing
For antibody-oligonucleotide conjugates, covering OAR/DOL, oligonucleotide payload
distribution (LC-MS), and free oligonucleotide residuals.
4. Submission-Ready Reporting
Reports include method validation, raw data, and compliance statements – ready for direct inclusion in the "drug
substance release testing" section of CMC documentation.
Technology Platforms and Testing Capabilities
| Platform |
Key Equipment / Capability |
Description |
| Chromatography |
HPLC/UPLC (SEC, IEX, HIC, RP), LC-MS/MS, CE-SDS, cIEF |
Purity (aggregates, charge variants, fragments), identity (peptide mapping), ADC DAR, mRNA capping
efficiency and polyA tail |
| Biophysical |
AUC, DLS, mass photometry (MP) |
AAV empty capsid rate (AUC gold standard), aggregate analysis, particle size, AOC payload
distribution (SEC-MALS/AEX-MALS) |
| Molecular Biology |
qPCR, ddPCR, NGS |
Residual DNA, rcAAV/RCL/RCR, AAV genome titer, lentiviral integration site analysis, mRNA
encapsulation efficiency |
| Cell Biology |
CO₂ incubators, microplate readers, SPR, flow cytometers |
Biological activity/potency (cell-based, ELISA, SPR), cell therapy phenotyping, cytotoxicity, viral
titer (TCID50) |
| Microbiology |
BSC, incubators, sterility isolator, colony counter |
Sterility (USP <71>), mycoplasma (qPCR + culture parallel validation), endotoxin (USP
<85> kinetic chromogenic) |
| Physicochemical |
pH meter, osmometer, UV/BCA, particle counter |
pH, osmolality, concentration, particulates (USP <788>) |
| Radiopharmaceutical |
Gamma spectrometer, HPLC-radio, TLC-radio, activity meter |
Radionuclide identification, radiochemical purity, radionuclidic purity, radioactivity (USP
<823>/<825>) |
Get Your Customized Drug Substance Release Plan
Drug substance release testing is not an "option" – it is a mandatory requirement under ICH Q6B for
biologics and a clear expectation under FDA CGT guidance for gene therapy products. If you are preparing a DS
release plan for your biologic or have uncertainties about product-specific testing, now is the best time to
front-load risks and validate proactively.
We will systematically design a dual-engine strategy of core release plus product-specific testing tailored to your
product type, development stage, and regulatory pathway – ensuring every decision is supported by robust data,
enhancing IND/BLA submission certainty and controllability from the source. Contact us today to request your
customized drug substance release testing plan.
FAQ
Q1: What is the difference between drug substance (DS) release testing and drug product (DP) release
testing?
A: DS release testing occurs before formulation and filling, focusing on intrinsic quality attributes –
identity, purity, impurities, biological activity, and safety (sterility/mycoplasma/endotoxin). DP
release testing adds formulation-specific attributes – particulates, container-closure integrity, fill
volume, visible particles, and stability. DS release is a prerequisite for DP release. ICH Q6B primarily
addresses DS release, while USP chapters cover DP release requirements.
Q2: Is empty capsid rate testing mandatory for AAV DS release? What is the acceptance criterion?
A: Yes. FDA 2020 CGT guidance explicitly requires empty capsid rate testing. Industry practice typically
expects an empty capsid rate <30% (full capsid >70%), but specific criteria should be product- and
process-based. Our Advanced package provides orthogonal methods (AUC, IEX, TEM).
Q3: What capping efficiency level should be achieved for mRNA products?
A: Industry typical ≥95% for Cap-1 structure. LC-MS/MS is the most comprehensive method, quantifying
Cap-0, Cap-1, Cap-2, and uncapped species. Our Advanced package provides LC-MS capping efficiency with
full validation.
Q4: For DS release, should I choose the mycoplasma culture or the qPCR rapid method?
A: USP <63> requires that a qPCR method, if used as a replacement, must be validated to ≤10 CFU/mL
and validated in parallel with culture. For an IND submission, we recommend parallel validation. For
commercial release, a fully validated qPCR method may replace culture with regulatory approval. Our
Advanced package provides parallel validation.
Q5: For ADC DAR determination, should I choose HIC-, HPLC, or LC-MS?
A: HIC-HPLC is suitable for routine release testing (high throughput, low cost). LC-MS offers higher
resolution and deeper characterization (payload distribution, impurities). Our Advanced package offers
both HIC-and HPLC for release, and LC-MS for characterization.
Q6: How does DS release for AOCs differ from traditional ADCs?
A: AOCs conjugate oligonucleotides (siRNA, ASO) rather than small molecule toxins. Key CQAs include OAR
(analogous to DAR), payload distribution, free oligonucleotide residuals, and sequence integrity.
Testing strategies follow the ADC framework of ICH Q6B, adapted for oligonucleotide characteristics. Our
Advanced package provides AOC-specific methods (SEC-MALS, AEX-MALS, LC-MS).